Riggens v. State
805 So. 2d 1082, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 955, 2002 WL 125618
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 1, 2002
DocketNo. 5D00-3581
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 805 So. 2d 1082 (Riggens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Riggens v. State, 805 So. 2d 1082, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 955, 2002 WL 125618 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Atwater v. State, 788 So.2d 223, 227 (Fla.2001) (“[Hjabeas corpus petitions are not to be used for additional appeals on questions which could have been, should have been, or were raised on appeal or in a rule 3.850 motion, or on matters that were not objected to at trial”) (quoting Parker v. Dugger, 550 So.2d 459, 460 (Fla.1989)).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Medeiros v. State
846 So. 2d 1220 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
805 So. 2d 1082, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 955, 2002 WL 125618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riggens-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.