Riggens v. State
805 So. 2d 1082, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 955, 2002 WL 125618
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 1, 2002·No. No. 5D00-3581·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Atwater v. State, 788 So.2d 223, 227 (Fla.2001) (“[Hjabeas corpus petitions are not to be used for additional appeals on questions which could have been, should have been, or were raised on appeal or in a rule 3.850 motion, or on matters that were not objected to at trial”) (quoting Parker v. Dugger, 550 So.2d 459, 460 (Fla.1989)).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Riggens v. State, 805 So. 2d 1082, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 955, 2002 WL 125618 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
805 So. 2d 1082 (Riggens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Medeiros v. State
846 So. 2d 1220 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)