Rigell v. Department of Corrections

116 So. 3d 645, 2013 WL 3359197, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10827
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 5, 2013·No. No. 1D13-2229·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. Cf. Banks v. State, 916 So.2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (holding that interlocutory indigency/lien order is not appealable, and that review is properly sought upon entry of a final order disposing of the substance of the proceedings).

LEWIS, C.J., ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rigell v. Department of Corrections, 116 So. 3d 645, 2013 WL 3359197, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10827 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

116 So. 3d 645 (Rigell v. Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Banks v. State
916 So. 2d 35 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)