Rigdon v. Claypool & Wheeler

1922 OK 228, 207 P. 974, 86 Okla. 262, 1922 Okla. LEXIS 176
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided June 27, 1922·No. 12977·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

McNEILL, J.

This proceeding was instituted in this court by George B. Rigdon against Claypool & Wheeler, Associated Employers' Reciprocal, and the State Industrial Commission to reverse an order of the Industrial Commission denying the claimant compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The questions involved are identical with the case of Walter Canode v. Claypool & Wheeler et al. (No. 12976. this day decided), 86 Okla. 262, 207 Pac. 974, and the questions there decided control the questions involved in this case.

Tire order of the Industrial Commission is affirmed upon authority of the case of Canode v. Claypool & Wheeler et al. (No. 12976, this day decided).

HARRISON, C. J„ and JOHNSON, EL-TING, and NICHOLSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rigdon v. Claypool & Wheeler, 1922 OK 228, 207 P. 974, 86 Okla. 262, 1922 Okla. LEXIS 176 (Okla. 1922).

1922 OK 228 (Rigdon v. Claypool & Wheeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parsons v. State Industrial Court
1962 OK 125 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1962)
Bond Marble & Tile Office v. Rose
1958 OK 63 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1958)
Updike Advertising System, Inc. v. State Industrial Commission
1955 OK 19 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1955)
Keener Oil & Gas Co. v. Bushong
1936 OK 147 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1936)
St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Matthews
1935 OK 775 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
Hunt v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.
1924 OK 169 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)