Rigby v. W. H. Palmer Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Rigby v. W. H. Palmer Co.

91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 371

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 20, 1914·No. No. 13959·Published

Opinion

Judgment of the circuit court reversed and that of the common pleas affirmed.

Journal entry: It appearing from the record that the written acceptance sued upon is not an unconditional acceptance but is subject to the conditions written in the order itself, and that the written order was not an unconditional order for the payment of money within the meaning of Section 8231, General Code, it is ordered and adjudged [372]*372by this court that the judgment of the circuit court of Mahoning county is hereby reversed, and the judgment of the common pleas affirmed. — Reporter.

Nichols, C. J., Shauck, Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the circuit court reversed and that of the common pleas affirmed.

Journal entry: It appearing from the record that the written acceptance sued upon is not an unconditional acceptance but is subject to the conditions written in the order itself, and that the written order was not an unconditional order for the payment of money within the meaning of Section 8231, General Code, it is ordered and adjudged [372]*372by this court that the judgment of the circuit court of Mahoning county is hereby reversed, and the judgment of the common pleas affirmed. — Reporter.

Nichols, C. J., Shauck, Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Rigby v. W. H. Palmer Co., 91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 371 (Ohio 1914).

Pincite

91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 371 (Rigby v. W. H. Palmer Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.