Rigby v. W. H. Palmer Co.
This text of 91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 371 (Rigby v. W. H. Palmer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of the circuit court reversed and that of the common pleas affirmed.
Journal entry: It appearing from the record that the written acceptance sued upon is not an unconditional acceptance but is subject to the conditions written in the order itself, and that the written order was not an unconditional order for the payment of money within the meaning of Section 8231, General Code, it is ordered and adjudged [372]*372by this court that the judgment of the circuit court of Mahoning county is hereby reversed, and the judgment of the common pleas affirmed. — Reporter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rigby-v-w-h-palmer-co-ohio-1914.