Riffin v. Snyder

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 14, 2005
• Docket: 04-2227
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2227

JAMES RIFFIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ADAM D. SNYDER; MICHAEL V. FORLINI; C. ROBERT LOSKOT; PAUL M. MAYHEW,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA- 04-2964-RDB)

Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 14, 2005

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Riffin, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Rosewin Sweeney, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; John Edward Beverungen, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

James Riffin appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Riffin v. Snyder, No. CA-04-2964-RDB (D. Md.

Sept. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -