Riffin v. Snyder

Fourth Circuit

Riffin v. Snyder

120 F. App'x 514

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 14, 2005·No. No. 04-2227·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Riffin appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Riffin v. Snyder, No. CA-04-2964-RDB (D.Md. Sept. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James Riffin appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Riffin v. Snyder, No. CA-04-2964-RDB (D.Md. Sept. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Riffin v. Snyder, 120 F. App'x 514 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

120 F. App'x 514 (Riffin v. Snyder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.