Riffin v. Friedman

446 F. App'x 614
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 13, 2011·No. No. 11-1172·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Riffin appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting the Trustee’s motion for approval of a settlement agreement, to cooperate to obtain access to a letter of credit, and to modify, as necessary, the automatic stay, 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Riffin v. Friedman, Nos. 1:10-cv-02618-CCB; 10-11248-DK (D.Md. Feb. 7, 2011). We dis[615]*615pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riffin v. Friedman, 446 F. App'x 614 (4th Cir. 2011).

446 F. App'x 614 (Riffin v. Friedman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Automatic stay
11 U.S.C. § 362(a)