Riffert v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.

341 S.W.3d 193, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 640, 2011 WL 1796406
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 10, 2011·No. ED 95543·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rodney Charles Riffert (Claimant) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) affirming and adopting the decision of the Appeals Tribunal of the Missouri Division of Employment Security, which found in favor of United Healthcare Services, Inc., on Claimant’s claim for unemployment benefits.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riffert v. United Healthcare Services, Inc., 341 S.W.3d 193, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 640, 2011 WL 1796406 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

341 S.W.3d 193 (Riffert v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haslag v. Capital Region Medical Center
341 S.W.3d 193 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)