Rife v. Rife

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rife v. Rife

286 S.W.3d 871, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1092, 2009 WL 2223046

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rife v. Rife. Read the opinion of the Court — 207 S.W.3d 199 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 28, 2009·No. WD 69716, WD 69812·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Monte Rife and Stacie Rife appeal the judgment of the trial court dissolving their marriage. On appeal, Stacie Rife claims that the trial court erred in characterizing the parties’ home as marital property. *872 Monte Rife claims that the trial court erred in its division of marital property and in denying his requests for maintenance and attorney’s fees. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Monte Rife and Stacie Rife appeal the judgment of the trial court dissolving their marriage. On appeal, Stacie Rife claims that the trial court erred in characterizing the parties’ home as marital property. *872 Monte Rife claims that the trial court erred in its division of marital property and in denying his requests for maintenance and attorney’s fees. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Rife v. Rife, 286 S.W.3d 871, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1092, 2009 WL 2223046 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

286 S.W.3d 871 (Rife v. Rife) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.