Rife v. Rife

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rife v. Rife

286 S.W.3d 871, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1092, 2009 WL 2223046

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 28, 2009

DocketWD 69716, WD 69812

StatusPublished

This text of 286 S.W.3d 871 (Rife v. Rife) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rife v. Rife, 286 S.W.3d 871, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1092, 2009 WL 2223046 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Monte Rife and Stacie Rife appeal the judgment of the trial court dissolving their marriage. On appeal, Stacie Rife claims that the trial court erred in characterizing the parties’ home as marital property. *872 Monte Rife claims that the trial court erred in its division of marital property and in denying his requests for maintenance and attorney’s fees. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Monte Rife and Stacie Rife appeal the judgment of the trial court dissolving their marriage. On appeal, Stacie Rife claims that the trial court erred in characterizing the parties’ home as marital property. *872 Monte Rife claims that the trial court erred in its division of marital property and in denying his requests for maintenance and attorney’s fees. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 S.W.3d 871, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1092, 2009 WL 2223046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rife-v-rife-moctapp-2009.