Rife v. Inghram

3 Greene 125
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedMay 15, 1851
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Greene 125 (Rife v. Inghram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rife v. Inghram, 3 Greene 125 (iowa 1851).

Opinion

Opinion by

Greene, J.

Assumpsit on promissory note. Judgment for the plaintiff

D. Rorer, for plaintiff in error. Grimes and Starr, for defendant.

The only error complained of is that the clerk assessed damages. It appears that the ¡parties submitted the eause to the court and it being adjudged that the plaintiff was entitled to recover on the note, the court ordered the clerk to assess damages. In this proceeding we think there is no error. The record denotes an agreement of the parties to submit the facts in the case to the court. This is authorized by .statute. E.ev. Stat. 470, § 9. 'The court decided the question at issue and directed a computation of damages. This having been done under direction of the judge, by his clerk, was virtually the action of the court, and is all the statute requires. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Greene 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rife-v-inghram-iowa-1851.