Riethbrock v. Lange

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Riethbrock v. Lange. Read the opinion of the Court — 128 Haw. 1
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided December 27, 2011·No. SCWC-28289·Published

Opinion

NO. SCWC-28289

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

HEINRICH ALEXANDER RIETHBROCK, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

MARION BARBARA LANGE, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NOS. 28289 and 28694; FC-D No. 04-1-0147)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Heinrich Alexander

Riethbrock’s application for writ of certiorari filed on

November 16, 2011, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, December 27, 2011.

R. Steven Geshell /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

on the application for petitioner/plaintiff- /s/ Paula A. Nakayama appellant.

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riethbrock v. Lange, (haw 2011).

Riethbrock v. Lange (Riethbrock v. Lange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.