Riethbrock v. Lange
This text of Riethbrock v. Lange (Riethbrock v. Lange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. SCWC-28289
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
HEINRICH ALEXANDER RIETHBROCK, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
MARION BARBARA LANGE, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(ICA NOS. 28289 and 28694; FC-D No. 04-1-0147)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Heinrich Alexander
Riethbrock’s application for writ of certiorari filed on
November 16, 2011, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be
heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant
to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move
for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, December 27, 2011.
R. Steven Geshell /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
on the application for
petitioner/plaintiff- /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
appellant.
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Riethbrock v. Lange, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riethbrock-v-lange-haw-2011.