Riesner v. Rosenthal

9 So. 2d 722, 151 Fla. 355, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1176

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 29, 1942·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM :

The appellants have failed to make it clearly appear that error was committed by the chancellor, therefore, the decree is—

Affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riesner v. Rosenthal, 9 So. 2d 722, 151 Fla. 355, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1176 (Fla. 1942).

Pincite

9 So. 2d 722 (Riesner v. Rosenthal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.