Riesner v. Rosenthal

9 So. 2d 722, 151 Fla. 355, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1176
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 29, 1942
StatusPublished

This text of 9 So. 2d 722 (Riesner v. Rosenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Riesner v. Rosenthal, 9 So. 2d 722, 151 Fla. 355, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1176 (Fla. 1942).

Opinion

PER CURIAM :

The appellants have failed to make it clearly appear that error was committed by the chancellor, therefore, the decree is—

Affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 So. 2d 722, 151 Fla. 355, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riesner-v-rosenthal-fla-1942.