Riesenberger v. Sullivan

3 A.D.2d 916, 163 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5649
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 6, 1957·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to require appellant to sell a parcel of real property, and to divide the proceeds with respondent in accordance with her written agreement to do so (first cause of action), and for other relief (second and third causes of action), a counterclaim was interposed to reform the agreement and to recover certain payments alleged to be due thereunder. The appeal is from an interlocutory judgment entered after trial insofar as said judgment is in favor of respondent. Judgment insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riesenberger v. Sullivan, 3 A.D.2d 916, 163 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5649 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

3 A.D.2d 916 (Riesenberger v. Sullivan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Andrews v. Dolan
158 A.D.2d 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Plummer v. Plummer
80 Misc. 2d 934 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)