Riesenberger v. Sullivan
This text of 3 A.D.2d 916 (Riesenberger v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to require appellant to sell a parcel of real property, and to divide the proceeds with respondent in accordance with her written agreement to do so (first cause of action), and for other relief (second and third causes of action), a counterclaim was interposed to reform the agreement and to recover certain payments alleged to be due thereunder. The appeal is from an interlocutory judgment entered after trial insofar as said judgment is in favor of respondent. Judgment insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 A.D.2d 916, 163 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riesenberger-v-sullivan-nyappdiv-1957.