Riesco v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

889 So. 2d 119, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17875, 2004 WL 2727450
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 24, 2004·No. No. 3D03-2113·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decision below denying unemployment compensation benefits is reversed because the conduct complained of did not, as a matter law, amount to disqualifying “misconduct.” § 443.036(29), Fla. Stat. (2003); Castillo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 785 So.2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). After remand, the appellant shall be awarded the benefits claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riesco v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 889 So. 2d 119, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17875, 2004 WL 2727450 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

889 So. 2d 119 (Riesco v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Cooper
889 So. 2d 119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)