Ries v. Stark
92 N.Y.S. 1143
This text of 92 N.Y.S. 1143 (Ries v. Stark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ries v. Stark, 92 N.Y.S. 1143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).
Opinion
The contract relied upon is unilateral, and without consideration or mutuality. In any event, its only purpose was to enable the broker to collect from the seller, and it does not appear that he lost anything by defendant’s failure to notify him. The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
92 N.Y.S. 1143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ries-v-stark-nyappterm-1905.