Ries v. Stark

92 N.Y.S. 1143
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 21, 1905·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The contract relied upon is unilateral, and without consideration or mutuality. In any event, its only purpose was to enable the broker to collect from the seller, and it does not appear that he lost anything by defendant’s failure to notify him. The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ries v. Stark, 92 N.Y.S. 1143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

92 N.Y.S. 1143 (Ries v. Stark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.