Ries v. Ries

319 So. 2d 165, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15301
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 8, 1975·No. No. 74-1640·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs and oral argument and after a review of the record on appeal we are of the opinion that the record supports petitioner’s entitlement to permanent alimony in the amount of $250.00 per month rather than rehabilitative alimony. See Patterson v. Patterson, 315 So.2d 104, Fla., Fourth District Court of Appeal, opinion filed June 6, 1975. In all other respects the final judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part.

OWEN and MAGER, JJ., and DIA-MANTTS, GEORGE N., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ries v. Ries, 319 So. 2d 165, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15301 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

319 So. 2d 165 (Ries v. Ries) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gillman v. Gillman
319 So. 2d 165 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)