Rienzi v. Rienzi

23 A.D.3d 450, 808 N.Y.S.2d 116
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 14, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases

This text of 23 A.D.3d 450 (Rienzi v. Rienzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rienzi v. Rienzi, 23 A.D.3d 450, 808 N.Y.S.2d 116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

In an action to reform or rescind a stipulation of settlement, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lebowitz, J.), dated January 28, 2005, which, sua sponte, dismissed the action.

Ordered that the notice of appeal from the order dated January 28, 2005, is deemed an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, with costs, and the complaint is reinstated.

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in, sua sponte, dismissing the plaintiffs action to reform or rescind the parties’ stipulation of settlement (see Hoeffner v John F. Frank, Inc., 302 AD2d 428 [2003]; Loft Rest. Assoc. v McDonagh, 187 AD2d 643 [1992]; Gibbs v Kinsey, 120 AD2d 701 [1986]). The power of the court to dismiss an action, sua sponte, is to be used sparingly (see Myung Chun v North Am. Mtge. Co., 285 AD2d 42 [2001]). The exercise of such power in this case was improper because no extraordinary circumstances were present to warrant dismissal (id.).

Moreover, we disagree with the Supreme Court’s implementation of the doctrine of collateral estoppel as the basis for its dismissal of the action, sua sponte, in view of the fact that it was not pleaded by the defendant as an affirmative defense (see CPLR 3018 [b]; 3211 [a] [5]), as was required (see Pace v Perk, 81 AD2d 444 [1981]; Surlak v Surlak, 95 AD2d 371 [1983]). In any event, there was no identicality of issues (see generally Parker v Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co., 93 NY2d 343 [1999]; D’Arata v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 76 NY2d 659 [1990]) between this action and a post-judgment enforcement proceeding in the parties’ matrimonial action (see Rienzi v Rienzi, 23 AD3d 447 [2005] [decided herewith]). Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Luciano and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Tampone v. Town of Red Hook Town Bd.
2023 NY Slip Op 02012 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Ams. v. Martinez
214 A.D.3d 704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
CRC Ins. Servs., Inc. v. Kullman
180 N.Y.S.3d 589 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Bongiorno v. Di Frisco
2021 NY Slip Op 04211 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Stinnett v. Delta
Second Circuit, 2020
Cheslowitz v. Board of Trustees of the Knox Sch.
2017 NY Slip Op 8807 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Wallace v. BSD-M Realty, LLC
142 A.D.3d 701 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Bay Head, Inc. v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
138 A.D.3d 905 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Maynard v. Maynard
138 A.D.3d 794 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Henning v. 17 Murray Rest Corp.
137 A.D.3d 1216 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Rossi v. Flying Horse Farm, Inc.
131 A.D.3d 1033 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Oak Hollow Nursing Center v. Stumbo
117 A.D.3d 698 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Taher
104 A.D.3d 815 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Menardy v. Gladstone Properties, Inc.
100 A.D.3d 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Atkins-Payne v. Branch
95 A.D.3d 912 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
NYCTL 2008-A Trust v. Estate of Holas
93 A.D.3d 650 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Guichardo
90 A.D.3d 1032 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Degregorio v. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance
90 A.D.3d 694 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
U.S. Bank, National Ass'n v. Emmanuel
83 A.D.3d 1047 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Progressive Northeastern Insurance v. North State Autobahn, Inc.
71 A.D.3d 657 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 A.D.3d 450, 808 N.Y.S.2d 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rienzi-v-rienzi-nyappdiv-2005.