Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Rienoehl v. Huonker

Rienoehl v. Huonker

66 Ohio St. (N.S.) 657
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 1, 1902·No. No. 7263·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed on the ground that the request should have been made of the solicitor in office,, and not of his predecessor; and on the further ground that injunction is not the proper remedy. The remedy is quo warranto.

Williams, C. J., Burket, Spear, Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rienoehl v. Huonker, 66 Ohio St. (N.S.) 657 (Ohio 1902).

66 Ohio St. (N.S.) 657 (Rienoehl v. Huonker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.