Riemer v. Hursey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Riemer v. Hursey

251 A.D. 719, 296 N.Y.S. 1018, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7206

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 28, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D. 719 (Riemer v. Hursey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Riemer v. Hursey, 251 A.D. 719, 296 N.Y.S. 1018, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7206 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously modified to provide that the Holley Hotel Company be examined through an officer of that defendant having knowledge of the facts other than the eodefendant, Jesse G. Hursey, but if defendant The Holley Hotel Company fails to produce such officer having such knowledge, the examination may then proceed through the codefendant, Hursey. No opinion. Settle order on notice; the date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Present— Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified to provide that the Holley Hotel Company be examined through an officer of that defendant having knowledge of the facts other than the eodefendant, Jesse G. Hursey, but if defendant The Holley Hotel Company fails to produce such officer having such knowledge, the examination may then proceed through the codefendant, Hursey. No opinion. Settle order on notice; the date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Present— Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D. 719, 296 N.Y.S. 1018, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riemer-v-hursey-nyappdiv-1937.