Riemer v. Hursey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Riemer v. Hursey

251 A.D. 719, 296 N.Y.S. 1018, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7206

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 28, 1937·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously modified to provide that the Holley Hotel Company be examined through an officer of that defendant having knowledge of the facts other than the eodefendant, Jesse G. Hursey, but if defendant The Holley Hotel Company fails to produce such officer having such knowledge, the examination may then proceed through the codefendant, Hursey. No opinion. Settle order on notice; the date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Present— Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified to provide that the Holley Hotel Company be examined through an officer of that defendant having knowledge of the facts other than the eodefendant, Jesse G. Hursey, but if defendant The Holley Hotel Company fails to produce such officer having such knowledge, the examination may then proceed through the codefendant, Hursey. No opinion. Settle order on notice; the date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Present— Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Riemer v. Hursey, 251 A.D. 719, 296 N.Y.S. 1018, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7206 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

251 A.D. 719 (Riemer v. Hursey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.