Riehl v. West Farms-Tremont Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Riehl v. West Farms-Tremont Corp.

162 Misc. 247, 293 N.Y.S. 360, 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1639

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 162 Misc. 247 (Riehl v. West Farms-Tremont Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Riehl v. West Farms-Tremont Corp., 162 Misc. 247, 293 N.Y.S. 360, 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1639 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Peb Cubiam.

There was proof of the violation of an ordinance with respect to lighting, and under the circumstances defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s contributory negligence were questions of fact. It was error, therefore, for the court to dismiss the complaint, and the order setting aside the dismissal was proper.

Order affirmed, with costs to respondents to abide the event.

Present — Lydon, Levy and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peb Cubiam.

There was proof of the violation of an ordinance with respect to lighting, and under the circumstances defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s contributory negligence were questions of fact. It was error, therefore, for the court to dismiss the complaint, and the order setting aside the dismissal was proper.

Order affirmed, with costs to respondents to abide the event.

Present — Lydon, Levy and Callahan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 Misc. 247, 293 N.Y.S. 360, 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riehl-v-west-farms-tremont-corp-nyappterm-1936.