Riego De Dios v. Gonzales

176 F. App'x 911
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 3, 2006
DocketNo. 05-75401
StatusPublished

This text of 176 F. App'x 911 (Riego De Dios v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Riego De Dios v. Gonzales, 176 F. App'x 911 (9th Cir. 2006).

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction is granted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir. 2002). The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

All other pending motions are denied as moot.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 F. App'x 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riego-de-dios-v-gonzales-ca9-2006.