Rieger v. Linkow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rieger v. Linkow

116 A.D.2d 499, 497 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51351

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 16, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 116 A.D.2d 499 (Rieger v. Linkow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rieger v. Linkow, 116 A.D.2d 499, 497 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51351 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert H. Wagner, J.), entered on April 25, 1985, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages unless plaintiff Arnold Rieger, within 20 days after service upon his attorney of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the Clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in his favor in the net sum, after apportionment, of $150,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If said plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so reduced, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur&emdash;Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert H. Wagner, J.), entered on April 25, 1985, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages unless plaintiff Arnold Rieger, within 20 days after service upon his attorney of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the Clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in his favor in the net sum, after apportionment, of $150,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If said plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so reduced, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur&emdash;Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 A.D.2d 499, 497 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rieger-v-linkow-nyappdiv-1986.