Riegelman v. United States
This text of 127 F. 493 (Riegelman v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The term “cylinder glass,” as used in the tariff act of 1897 (30 Stat. 151 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1625]), is descriptive of glass manufactured by first blowing the glass into large cylinders, flattening the same on hot iron plates, then cutting [494]*494in squares and sizes named in the statute, and finishing by polishing or beveling. In my opinion, the cylinder glass described in the protest is cylinder glass polished or beveled, and hence the importation was correctly assessed an additional duty of 5 per cent, ad valorem, under' paragraph 107, Schedule B, § 1, c. xi, 30 Stat. 158 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1635].
Decision of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 F. 493, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riegelman-v-united-states-circtsdny-1903.