Riegelman v. United States

127 F. 493, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5235
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedDecember 23, 1903
DocketNo. 3,327
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 127 F. 493 (Riegelman v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Riegelman v. United States, 127 F. 493, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5235 (circtsdny 1903).

Opinion

HAZEL, District Judge.

The term “cylinder glass,” as used in the tariff act of 1897 (30 Stat. 151 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1625]), is descriptive of glass manufactured by first blowing the glass into large cylinders, flattening the same on hot iron plates, then cutting [494]*494in squares and sizes named in the statute, and finishing by polishing or beveling. In my opinion, the cylinder glass described in the protest is cylinder glass polished or beveled, and hence the importation was correctly assessed an additional duty of 5 per cent, ad valorem, under' paragraph 107, Schedule B, § 1, c. xi, 30 Stat. 158 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1635].

Decision of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Riegelman v. United States
134 F. 1021 (Second Circuit, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 F. 493, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riegelman-v-united-states-circtsdny-1903.