Riegel v. Savin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Riegel v. Savin

259 A.D. 1063, 22 N.Y.S.2d 203, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7966

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 28, 1940·Published

Opinion

Judgments and orders reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: It was error for the court to hold as matter of law that Mrs. Laughton was guilty of negligence in the manner of driving the car. On the question of imputed negligence see Webber v. Graves (234 App. Div. 579). All concur, except Crosby, P. J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. (The judgments are for defendants in an automobile negligence action. The orders deny motions for a new trial,) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgments and orders reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: It was error for the court to hold as matter of law that Mrs. Laughton was guilty of negligence in the manner of driving the car. On the question of imputed negligence see Webber v. Graves (234 App. Div. 579). All concur, except Crosby, P. J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. (The judgments are for defendants in an automobile negligence action. The orders deny motions for a new trial,) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Riegel v. Savin, 259 A.D. 1063, 22 N.Y.S.2d 203, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7966 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

259 A.D. 1063 (Riegel v. Savin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related