Riedman v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Riedman v. Goord

251 A.D.2d 720, 672 N.Y.S.2d 272, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6470

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 4, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D.2d 720 (Riedman v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Riedman v. Goord, 251 A.D.2d 720, 672 N.Y.S.2d 272, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6470 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

The Attorney-General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references to the disciplinary hearing have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional records. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Martin v Henderson, 159 AD2d 867).

[721]*721Mikoll, J. P., Mereure, White, Peters and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

The Attorney-General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references to the disciplinary hearing have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional records. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Martin v Henderson, 159 AD2d 867).

[721]*721Mikoll, J. P., Mereure, White, Peters and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D.2d 720, 672 N.Y.S.2d 272, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riedman-v-goord-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack