Riedell v. S. Karpen & Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Riedell v. S. Karpen & Bros.

266 A.D. 850, 42 N.Y.S.2d 112, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4874

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1943

StatusPublished

This text of 266 A.D. 850 (Riedell v. S. Karpen & Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Riedell v. S. Karpen & Bros., 266 A.D. 850, 42 N.Y.S.2d 112, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

[851]*851Close, P. J., Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., concurs except as to the affirmance of the judgment against S. Iiarpen & Bros., the owner of the building, as to which he dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to dismiss the complaint as to said defendant on the ground that the installation of a light of glass in a ydndow by an independent contractor does not involve work which is inherently dangerous. In any event the injury did not occur by virtue of the nature of the work but in a detail thereof incidental to performance, for which the owner cannot be held responsible. (Hyman v. Barrett, 224 N. Y. 436; Wemfeld v. Kaplan, 282 N. Y. 348.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[851]*851Close, P. J., Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., concurs except as to the affirmance of the judgment against S. Iiarpen & Bros., the owner of the building, as to which he dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to dismiss the complaint as to said defendant on the ground that the installation of a light of glass in a ydndow by an independent contractor does not involve work which is inherently dangerous. In any event the injury did not occur by virtue of the nature of the work but in a detail thereof incidental to performance, for which the owner cannot be held responsible. (Hyman v. Barrett, 224 N. Y. 436; Wemfeld v. Kaplan, 282 N. Y. 348.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D. 850, 42 N.Y.S.2d 112, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riedell-v-s-karpen-bros-nyappdiv-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack