Riedel v. J. R. Watts & Sons, Inc.
This text of 158 So. 890 (Riedel v. J. R. Watts & Sons, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
A suit by attachment was instituted on behalf of C. E. Riedel against J. R. Watts & Sons, Inc. The declaration was one of breach of covenant to pay a note in the sum of $329.56, with interest. There was one plea, a plea of payment, as follows:
“That before action it discharged and satisfied plaintiff’s claim by payment.”
Plaintiff proved the covenant and the breach.
Defendant tendered no evidence of payment.
The evidence submitted, if it tended to prove any defense, was one of accord and satisfaction. That was' not pleaded and, therefore, such evidence was irrelevant and immaterial and should have been excluded on timely objection being made.
It is elementary that when the plaintiff has produced sufficient evidence to establish his cause of action and right to recover a defendant who has pleaded payment then takeá the burden of proving payment, and the proof of some other defense will not suffice, nor warrant a verdict and judgment in his favor.
The judgment should be reversed and the cause remanded for a new'trial.
It is so ordered.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 So. 890, 118 Fla. 285, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riedel-v-j-r-watts-sons-inc-fla-1935.