Rieche v. Spears

Supreme Court of Florida

Rieche v. Spears

783 So. 2d 238, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 224, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 626, 2001 WL 326765

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedApril 5, 2001

DocketNo. SC95155

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 783 So. 2d 238 (Rieche v. Spears) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rieche v. Spears, 783 So. 2d 238, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 224, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 626, 2001 WL 326765 (Fla. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PARIENTE, J.

We have for review the decision in Rieche v. Spears, 727 So.2d 409 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), in which the Third District Court of Appeal certified conflict with Paul v. Jenne, 728 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in State v. Paul, 783 So.2d 1042 (Fla.2001), we quash the district court’s decision in this case.¹

It is so ordered.

SHAW, ANSTEAD and LEWIS, JJ., concur. WELLS, C.J., and HARDING and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PARIENTE, J.

We have for review the decision in Rieche v. Spears, 727 So.2d 409 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), in which the Third District Court of Appeal certified conflict with Paul v. Jenne, 728 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in State v. Paul, 783 So.2d 1042 (Fla.2001), we quash the district court’s decision in this case.¹

It is so ordered.

SHAW, ANSTEAD and LEWIS, JJ., concur. WELLS, C.J., and HARDING and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

783 So. 2d 238, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 224, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 626, 2001 WL 326765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rieche-v-spears-fla-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack