Ridore v. State
282 A.D.2d 731, 724 N.Y.S.2d 352, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4215
Opinion
—In a proceeding pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 10 (6) for leave to file a late claim, the claimant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Marin, J.), dated July 13, 2000, which denied the application.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs,
The Court of Claims providently exercised its discretion in denying the claimant’s application for leave to file a late claim (see, Matter of Maurantonio v State of New York, 266 AD2d 290). Ritter, J. P., Altman, McGinity, Smith and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ridore v. State, 282 A.D.2d 731, 724 N.Y.S.2d 352, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4215 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).
282 A.D.2d 731 (Ridore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gonzalez v. City of New York
266 A.D.2d 290 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)