Ridling v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Ridling v. State

702 S.W.2d 811, 288 Ark. 198, 1986 Ark. LEXIS 1771

DecidedFebruary 10, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 702 S.W.2d 811 (Ridling v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ridling v. State, 702 S.W.2d 811, 288 Ark. 198, 1986 Ark. LEXIS 1771 (Ark. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, James K. Ridling, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, John W. Leach, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5,1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Purtle, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI