Ridley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Ridley v. State

97 S.E. 558, 23 Ga. App. 92, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 55

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 20, 1918

Docket10040

StatusPublished

This text of 97 S.E. 558 (Ridley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ridley v. State, 97 S.E. 558, 23 Ga. App. 92, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 55 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. There is no merit in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

2. There is evidence authorizing the verdict, no error of law appears, and the finding of the jury having the sanction of the trial judge, under the repeated and uniform rulings of this and the Supreme Court, a reviewing court is powerless to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

1. There is no merit in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

2. There is evidence authorizing the verdict, no error of law appears, and the finding of the jury having the sanction of the trial judge, under the repeated and uniform rulings of this and the Supreme Court, a reviewing court is powerless to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 S.E. 558, 23 Ga. App. 92, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ridley-v-state-gactapp-1918.