Ridley v. State

68 S.E.2d 565, 208 Ga. 629, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 275
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 16, 1952·No. No. 17669·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

1. Where newly discovered evidence, urged as a ground for new trial, was that of a psychiatrist as to the mental condition of the accused, but no affidavits as to the witness’s residence, associates, means of knowledge, character, and credibility were adduced, such is not a compliance with the provisions of Code § 70-205, and the discretion of the trial judge in refusing a new trial on this ground will not be disturbed. Phillips v. State, 138 Ga. 815 (2) (76 S. E. 352); Bass v. State, 152 Ga. 415 (11) (110 S. E. 237); Cole v. State, 176 Ga. 135 (2) (167 S. E. 172); Grier v. State, 196 Ga. 515 (1) (26 S. E. 2d, 889).

2. The general grounds of the motion are expressly abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ridley v. State, 68 S.E.2d 565, 208 Ga. 629, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 275 (Ga. 1952).

68 S.E.2d 565 (Ridley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robertson v. Robertson
83 S.E.2d 619 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)