Ridley v. Hereford & Timberlake
66 Ala. 261
This text of 66 Ala. 261 (Ridley v. Hereford & Timberlake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ridley v. Hereford & Timberlake, 66 Ala. 261 (Ala. 1880).
Opinion
If the items composing the account sued on can be called articles, they fall within no class for which the statutory separate estate of the wife can be made liable under section 2711 of the Code of 1876.—Lobman v. Kennedy, 51 Ala. 163; Eskridge v. Ditmars, Ib. 245; Lee v. Campbell, 61 Ala. 12; Durden v. McWilliams, 31 Ala. 438.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ward v. Johnson
80 Ala. 281 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1885)
Lee v. Winston
68 Ala. 402 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1880)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
66 Ala. 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ridley-v-hereford-timberlake-ala-1880.