Ridley v. Dixon

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 30, 2025
Docket1D2024-1831
StatusPublished

This text of Ridley v. Dixon (Ridley v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ridley v. Dixon, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2024-1831 _____________________________

ISAIAH RIDLEY,

Petitioner,

v.

RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

July 30, 2025

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED as unauthorized. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236, 1245–46 (Fla. 2004).

RAY, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Isaiah Ridley, pro se, Petitioner.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. State
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ridley v. Dixon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ridley-v-dixon-fladistctapp-2025.