Ridley v. Dixon
This text of Ridley v. Dixon (Ridley v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2024-1831 _____________________________
ISAIAH RIDLEY,
Petitioner,
v.
RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
July 30, 2025
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED as unauthorized. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236, 1245–46 (Fla. 2004).
RAY, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Isaiah Ridley, pro se, Petitioner.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ridley v. Dixon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ridley-v-dixon-fladistctapp-2025.