Ridley v. Allied Barton Company
This text of Ridley v. Allied Barton Company (Ridley v. Allied Barton Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
___________________________________ ) DONNA A. RIDLEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-0433 (EGS) ) ALLIED BARTON COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 5. On
October 23, 2015, the Court issued an Order advising plaintiff of her obligations under the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond to defendant’s
motion, and specifically warned plaintiff that, if she did not respond to the motion by November
25, 2015, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. ECF No. 6. To date, plaintiff has not
filed an opposition to the motion, requested more time to file her opposition, or advised the Court
of any change of address. Accordingly, the Court will treat defendant’s motion as conceded and
dismiss this case. An Order is issued separately.
Signed: EMMET G. SULLIVAN United States District Judge
Dated: December 3, 2015
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ridley v. Allied Barton Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ridley-v-allied-barton-company-dcd-2015.