Ridley Sch Dist v. M.R.
This text of Ridley Sch Dist v. M.R. (Ridley Sch Dist v. M.R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 11-1447
RIDLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
v.
M.R.; J.R., PARENTS OF MINOR CHILD E.R. v.
JANET CENNAME
M.R.; J.R. Parents of Minor Child E.R., Appellants
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. No. 2-09-cv-02503) District Judge: Honorable Mitchell S. Goldberg
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
John F.X. Reilly, counsel for Appellees the Ridley School District and Janet Cenname, in addition to having a private practice is also employed as an attorney for the Delaware County Office of the District Attorney. When the clerk entered Mr. Reilly’s appearance in the above entitled appeal, the clerk entered the address for the office of the District Attorney rather that the address for Mr. Reilly’s private practice.
Accordingly, it is hereby O R D E R E D that the opinion filed May 17, 2012, is hereby amended to reflect the correct address for John F. X. Reilly as follows:
John F.X. Reilly (Argued) 101 W. Baltimore Avenue, Second Floor Media, PA 19063 Counsel for Appellees For the Court,
Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk Dated: May 31, 2012 SLC/cc: Jennifer C. Lowman John F.X. Reilly Leonard Reiser Alan L. Yatvin
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ridley Sch Dist v. M.R., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ridley-sch-dist-v-mr-ca3-2012.