Ridlespurge v. Kmart Corporation

812 So. 2d 1211, 2001 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 501, 2001 WL 996074
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ridlespurge v. Kmart Corporation. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 751
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided August 31, 2001·No. 2990410·Published

Opinion

After Remand from the Supreme Court

PER CURIAM.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte Kmart Corporation, 812 So.2d 1205 (Ala.2001). That portion of the trial court’s judgment that this court affirmed was not reviewed on certiorari. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed as it relates to the compensability of Ridlespurge’s fibromyal-gia and insofar as it determined that Ri-dlespurge was “permanently and totally disabled” because of her right-shoulder injury. Thus, the trial court’s judgment of October 20,1999, is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All the judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ridlespurge v. Kmart Corporation, 812 So. 2d 1211, 2001 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 501, 2001 WL 996074 (Ala. Ct. App. 2001).

812 So. 2d 1211 (Ridlespurge v. Kmart Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Kmart Corp.
812 So. 2d 1205 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2001)