Ridgway v. Weeks
This text of 6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 29 (Ridgway v. Weeks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order referring it back to the master to review his report as to the appointment of a receiver, in this case ; and directing him to appoint some other person receiver. Costs to abide the event of the suit. Decided in this case that in creditors suits, especially where there is no defence, except that the defendants are destitute of property, the master, in appointing a receiver, should give a preference to the person nominated by the complainant, the if person thus nominated is a suitable and proper person.
The chancellor held it to be an objection to the appointment of a person named as receiver that he was a judgment creditor of, and endorser for, some of the defendants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 29, 1846 N.Y. LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ridgway-v-weeks-nychanct-1846.