Ridgway v. Bowser & Co.

80 S.E. 692, 14 Ga. App. 300, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 226
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 27, 1914
Docket5226
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 80 S.E. 692 (Ridgway v. Bowser & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ridgway v. Bowser & Co., 80 S.E. 692, 14 Ga. App. 300, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 226 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

Under the ruling in Kelly v. Strouse, 116 Ga. 872 (43 S. E. 280), a verdict may be attacked by a direct assignment of error upon the ground that no cause of action is set forth in the petition. In the present case the plaintiffs could have maintained trover, but since the suit was an action upon a contract, and both the petition and the evidence discloses that there was no privity between the plaintiffs and the defendant, the court erred in directing a verdict for the plaintiffs. Dickson v. Matthews, 10 Ga. App. 542 (73 S. E. 705).

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gunn v. Johnson & Co.
116 S.E. 921 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Rhodes v. Savannah Gas Co.
91 S.E. 241 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 S.E. 692, 14 Ga. App. 300, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ridgway-v-bowser-co-gactapp-1914.