Ridgley v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ridgley v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

43 So. 3d 956, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13725, 2010 WL 3584260

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 16, 2010

Docket1D10-3811

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 43 So. 3d 956 (Ridgley v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ridgley v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, 43 So. 3d 956, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13725, 2010 WL 3584260 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the notice of appeal seeking review of the June 16, 2010, final order was not filed with the lower tribunal until July 19, 2001, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED as untimely. See First Nat’l Bank in Ft. Myers v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 461 So.2d 208 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)(stating that appellant’s failure to file the notice of appeal within the requisite 30-day period is “an irremediable jurisdictional defect”); Raysor v. Raysor, 706 So.2d 400, 401 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (“In order to be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed with the appropriate court within the required time, and merely mailing the notice or having the notice placed in a post office box within the required time period is not sufficient.”).

LEWIS, ROWE, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because the notice of appeal seeking review of the June 16, 2010, final order was not filed with the lower tribunal until July 19, 2001, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED as untimely. See First Nat’l Bank in Ft. Myers v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 461 So.2d 208 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)(stating that appellant’s failure to file the notice of appeal within the requisite 30-day period is “an irremediable jurisdictional defect”); Raysor v. Raysor, 706 So.2d 400, 401 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (“In order to be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed with the appropriate court within the required time, and merely mailing the notice or having the notice placed in a post office box within the required time period is not sufficient.”).

LEWIS, ROWE, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 So. 3d 956, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13725, 2010 WL 3584260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ridgley-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack