Ridgewood Properties, Inc. v. State, Department of Community Affairs

548 So. 2d 1165, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2110, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4968, 1989 WL 104020
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 8, 1989·No. No. 88-2725·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final order in all respects. However, even though it is not prohibited by the Administrative Procedures Act, we believe it is at least not good policy for the Department Secretary to appear as a witness when the same Secretary is the one who later enters the final order. Judging should be separated from functions that are incompatible with judging and the legislature may want to address this. We certify to the Supreme Court as a question of great public importance:

IS IT A VIOLATION OF A PARTY'S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS IN AN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FOR THE HEAD OF A DEPARTMENT TO APPEAR AS AN EXPERT WITNESS WHEN THAT SAME DEPARTMENT HEAD LATER ENTERS THE FINAL ORDER IN THE CASE?
SHIVERS, C.J., and JOANOS, J., concur. ERVIN, J., concurs in result only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ridgewood Properties, Inc. v. State, Department of Community Affairs, 548 So. 2d 1165, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2110, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4968, 1989 WL 104020 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

548 So. 2d 1165 (Ridgewood Properties, Inc. v. State, Department of Community Affairs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

RIDGEWOOD PROP., INC. v. Dept. of Community Affairs
562 So. 2d 322 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)