Ridgeway v. Warren

Fourth Circuit

Ridgeway v. Warren

632 F. App'x 150

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 8, 2016·No. No. 15-7554·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Avenger Don Ridgeway appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(2012). We have reviewed the record and fínd no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ridgeway v. Warren, No. 5:15-ct03063-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2015). We deny Ridge-way’s motion for an expedited hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Avenger Don Ridgeway appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(2012). We have reviewed the record and fínd no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ridgeway v. Warren, No. 5:15-ct03063-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2015). We deny Ridge-way’s motion for an expedited hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ridgeway v. Warren, 632 F. App'x 150 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

632 F. App'x 150 (Ridgeway v. Warren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related