Ridgeway v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ridgeway v. State

179 S.W. 1186, 78 Tex. Crim. 81, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 196

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 10, 1915·No. No. 3822.·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors, his punishment being assessed at a fine of $100 and two months imprisonment in the county jail.

Court adjourned on September 5. The only bill of exceptions in the record was filed ón September 29, as was the statement of facts. These matters can not be considered. They must be filed within twenty days, or some reason shown why it was not done, which would relieve the appellant of negligence. The allegation in the motion for new trial of the insufficiency of the evidence, therefore, can not be considered.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors, his punishment being assessed at a fine of $100 and two months imprisonment in the county jail.

Court adjourned on September 5. The only bill of exceptions in the record was filed ón September 29, as was the statement of facts. These matters can not be considered. They must be filed within twenty days, or some reason shown why it was not done, which would relieve the appellant of negligence. The allegation in the motion for new trial of the insufficiency of the evidence, therefore, can not be considered.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Ridgeway v. State, 179 S.W. 1186, 78 Tex. Crim. 81, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 196 (Tex. 1915).

Pincite

179 S.W. 1186 (Ridgeway v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.