Ridgeway v. State

555 So. 2d 960, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 487, 1990 WL 5398
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 24, 1990·No. No. 89-2096·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was sentenced outside the guidelines range and argues that the reasons given for departure were invalid. We agree, vacate the sentence imposed, and reverse and remand for sentencing within the guidelines.

The order of trial court setting forth the reasons for departure stated the recommended sentence was “insufficient to properly rehabilitate the defendant, protect society, and provide restitution_” The protection of society is not a valid reason for departure. Mitchell v. State, 507 So.2d 686 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). The need for rehabilitation is also an invalid basis for departure. Matthews v. State, 502 So.2d 63 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). While the trial court may order restitution, it is in addition to any punishment and is not considered in the sentencing guidelines. Section 775.089, Florida Statutes.

Pursuant to Rule 9.315(b), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, the sentence is vacated and this cause reversed and remanded for sentencing within the guidelines.

ERVIN, SMITH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ridgeway v. State, 555 So. 2d 960, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 487, 1990 WL 5398 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

555 So. 2d 960 (Ridgeway v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Odom v. State
561 So. 2d 443 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)