Ridgeway v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ridgeway v. State

555 So. 2d 960, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 487, 1990 WL 5398

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 24, 1990

DocketNo. 89-2096

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 555 So. 2d 960 (Ridgeway v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ridgeway v. State, 555 So. 2d 960, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 487, 1990 WL 5398 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was sentenced outside the guidelines range and argues that the reasons given for departure were invalid. We agree, vacate the sentence imposed, and reverse and remand for sentencing within the guidelines.

The order of trial court setting forth the reasons for departure stated the recommended sentence was “insufficient to properly rehabilitate the defendant, protect society, and provide restitution_” The protection of society is not a valid reason for departure. Mitchell v. State, 507 So.2d 686 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). The need for rehabilitation is also an invalid basis for departure. Matthews v. State, 502 So.2d 63 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). While the trial court may order restitution, it is in addition to any punishment and is not considered in the sentencing guidelines. Section 775.089, Florida Statutes.

Pursuant to Rule 9.315(b), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, the sentence is vacated and this cause reversed and remanded for sentencing within the guidelines.

ERVIN, SMITH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was sentenced outside the guidelines range and argues that the reasons given for departure were invalid. We agree, vacate the sentence imposed, and reverse and remand for sentencing within the guidelines.

The order of trial court setting forth the reasons for departure stated the recommended sentence was “insufficient to properly rehabilitate the defendant, protect society, and provide restitution_” The protection of society is not a valid reason for departure. Mitchell v. State, 507 So.2d 686 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). The need for rehabilitation is also an invalid basis for departure. Matthews v. State, 502 So.2d 63 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). While the trial court may order restitution, it is in addition to any punishment and is not considered in the sentencing guidelines. Section 775.089, Florida Statutes.

Pursuant to Rule 9.315(b), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, the sentence is vacated and this cause reversed and remanded for sentencing within the guidelines.

ERVIN, SMITH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

555 So. 2d 960, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 487, 1990 WL 5398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ridgeway-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack