Ridgeway v. Real Estate Operating Co.
3 A.2d 584, 121 N.J.L. 585, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 281
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Walker, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ridgeway v. Real Estate Operating Co., 3 A.2d 584, 121 N.J.L. 585, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 281 (N.J. 1939).
3 A.2d 584 (Ridgeway v. Real Estate Operating Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.