Rider v. Britton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rider v. Britton

121 A.D. 930, 106 N.Y.S. 1142

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 121 A.D. 930 (Rider v. Britton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rider v. Britton, 121 A.D. 930, 106 N.Y.S. 1142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten' dollars costs and disbursements. Held, that it appearing by statements in appellant’s brief that the cause was upon the calendar at the term at which th^e order was granted, the court in the exercise of its discretion had the right to make the order appealed from independent of the provisions of rule [931]*93131 Of the General Rules of Practice. All concurred, except Spring, J., who dissented upon the authority of Ellensohn v. Keyes (6 App. Div. 601).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten' dollars costs and disbursements. Held, that it appearing by statements in appellant’s brief that the cause was upon the calendar at the term at which th^e order was granted, the court in the exercise of its discretion had the right to make the order appealed from independent of the provisions of rule [931]*93131 Of the General Rules of Practice. All concurred, except Spring, J., who dissented upon the authority of Ellensohn v. Keyes (6 App. Div. 601).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 A.D. 930, 106 N.Y.S. 1142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rider-v-britton-nyappdiv-1907.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack