Rider v. Britton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rider v. Britton

121 A.D. 930, 106 N.Y.S. 1142

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1907·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten' dollars costs and disbursements. Held, that it appearing by statements in appellant’s brief that the cause was upon the calendar at the term at which th^e order was granted, the court in the exercise of its discretion had the right to make the order appealed from independent of the provisions of rule [931]*93131 Of the General Rules of Practice. All concurred, except Spring, J., who dissented upon the authority of Ellensohn v. Keyes (6 App. Div. 601).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten' dollars costs and disbursements. Held, that it appearing by statements in appellant’s brief that the cause was upon the calendar at the term at which th^e order was granted, the court in the exercise of its discretion had the right to make the order appealed from independent of the provisions of rule [931]*93131 Of the General Rules of Practice. All concurred, except Spring, J., who dissented upon the authority of Ellensohn v. Keyes (6 App. Div. 601).

Rider v. Britton, 121 A.D. 930, 106 N.Y.S. 1142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

121 A.D. 930 (Rider v. Britton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related