Rider (Justin) v. the Justice Court of Esmeralda Township

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided March 17, 2016·No. 69761·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JUSTIN CHANSE RIDER, No. 69761 Petitioner, vs. FILED THE JUSTICE COURT OF ESMERALDA TOWNSHIP, ESMERALDA COUNTY, MAR 1 7 2016 STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

ORDER DENYING PETITION This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner challenges the justice court's denial of his motion for new trial or to vacate judgment. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.160; see also Nev. Const. art. 6, § 6; Tripp v. City of Sparks, 92 Nev. 362, 363, 550 P.2d 419, 419 (1976) (noting that district courts have final appellate jurisdiction over cases arising in lower courts). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

J.

J. Saitta

cc: Justin Chanse Rider Attorney General/Carson City Esmeralda County District Attorney Esmeralda County Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rider (Justin) v. the Justice Court of Esmeralda Township, (Neb. 2016).

Rider (Justin) v. the Justice Court of Esmeralda Township (Rider (Justin) v. the Justice Court of Esmeralda Township) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tripp v. City of Sparks
550 P.2d 419 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1976)