Rider (Justin) v. the Justice Court of Esmeralda Township
This text of Rider (Justin) v. the Justice Court of Esmeralda Township (Rider (Justin) v. the Justice Court of Esmeralda Township) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JUSTIN CHANSE RIDER, No. 69761 Petitioner, vs. FILED THE JUSTICE COURT OF ESMERALDA TOWNSHIP, ESMERALDA COUNTY, MAR 1 7 2016 STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
ORDER DENYING PETITION This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner challenges the justice court's denial of his motion for new trial or to vacate judgment. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.160; see also Nev. Const. art. 6, § 6; Tripp v. City of Sparks, 92 Nev. 362, 363, 550 P.2d 419, 419 (1976) (noting that district courts have final appellate jurisdiction over cases arising in lower courts). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
J.
J. Saitta
cc: Justin Chanse Rider Attorney General/Carson City Esmeralda County District Attorney Esmeralda County Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rider (Justin) v. the Justice Court of Esmeralda Township, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rider-justin-v-the-justice-court-of-esmeralda-township-nev-2016.