Rideout v. A. & K. Railway Co.
This text of 119 A. 305 (Rideout v. A. & K. Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this compensation case the only issue is that of causal connection between the industrial accident suffered by the petitioner’s husband and his death which occurred two months later. The issue is one of fact. The statute gives this court no authority to decide facts. Another tribunal has been established for such purpose and except in case of fraud its findings of fact are final. Its errors of law are of course Subject to review and correction by the court.
It is said that the Commissioner made an error of law in that he without evidence determined, in favor of the petitioner, the fact of causal connection.
If he made this finding without legal evidence it was an error of law. It was a. violation of a fundamental legal principle. Orff’s Case, 122 Maine, 114.
But the finding is supported by the opinion, introduced in evidence, of a reputable physician who attended and treated the patient. While such an opinion may fall far short of being a demonstration we cannot under the circumstances of this case say that a finding so supported is a finding without evidence. Appeal dismissed. Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
119 A. 305, 122 Me. 552, 1923 Me. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rideout-v-a-k-railway-co-me-1923.