Ridenhour v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Ridenhour v. State

643 S.W.2d 570, 278 Ark. 109, 1982 Ark. LEXIS 1613

DecidedDecember 20, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 643 S.W.2d 570 (Ridenhour v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ridenhour v. State, 643 S.W.2d 570, 278 Ark. 109, 1982 Ark. LEXIS 1613 (Ark. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Leonard E. Ridenhour, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Wayland A. Parker, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5,1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Leonard E. Ridenhour, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Wayland A. Parker, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5,1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

643 S.W.2d 570, 278 Ark. 109, 1982 Ark. LEXIS 1613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ridenhour-v-state-ark-1982.