Ridenhour v. Capital Regional Medical Center

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ridenhour v. Capital Regional Medical Center

477 S.W.3d 168, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1224, 2015 WL 7443687

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 24, 2015·No. No. ED 102880·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Cathy Ridenhour appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her disability benefits claim after she was discharged from Capital Regional Medical Center (Employer). We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Cathy Ridenhour appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her disability benefits claim after she was discharged from Capital Regional Medical Center (Employer). We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Ridenhour v. Capital Regional Medical Center, 477 S.W.3d 168, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1224, 2015 WL 7443687 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

477 S.W.3d 168 (Ridenhour v. Capital Regional Medical Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.