Riddock v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad

92 N.Y.S. 1143

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order modified, by striking out the extra allowance of costs, on the ground of want of power in the Trial Term; and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal.

HIRSCHBERG, P. J., dissents from that portion of the decision striking out the extra allowance, on the ground that the question was not raised in the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riddock v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad, 92 N.Y.S. 1143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

92 N.Y.S. 1143 (Riddock v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.